[Some more link abbrev tests
Panu Kalliokoski <pkalliok@ling.helsinki.fi>**20050406080841
 Keywords: 
 
 
 (atehwa@sange.fi--2005/stx2any--prod--2--patch-15)
] {
hunk ./TODO 20
-  * more extensive link abbreviation tests
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.docbook-xml 25
-URI's<Footnote><Para>RFC2396</Para></Footnote> is that you have hard time knowing where they stop.  Take
-for example <URI>http://www.plt-scheme.org/</URI>: why is the slash included but
+<Link linkend="label.3">URIs</Link> is that you<Footnote><Para>the reader</Para></Footnote> have hard time knowing where they stop.
+Take for example <URI>http://www.plt-scheme.org/</URI>: why is the slash included but
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.docbook-xml 28
-such positions.  People never properly quote URI's.</Para></Footnote>?  (Another example is
+such positions.  People never properly quote URI's, as required by
+<Link linkend="label.3">RFC2396</Link>.</Para></Footnote>?  (Another example is
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.docbook-xml 43
+
+</Para><Para>&mdash; &mdash; &mdash;
+
+</Para><Para>This is an interesting way to produce a bibliography:
+
+</Para><Para><Anchor id="label.3"/>RFC2396: Uniform Resource Identifies (URI): Generic Syntax
+(<URI>ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt</URI>)
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.html 28
-URI's<small>[3]</small> is that you have hard time knowing where they stop.  Take
-for example <a href="http://www.plt-scheme.org/">http://www.plt-scheme.org/</a>: why is the slash included but
+<a href="#label.3">URIs</a> is that you<small>[3]</small> have hard time knowing where they stop.
+Take for example <a href="http://www.plt-scheme.org/">http://www.plt-scheme.org/</a>: why is the slash included but
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.html 32
-<br><small>[3]</small> RFC2396<br>
+<br><small>[3]</small> the reader<br>
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.html 34
-such positions.  People never properly quote URI's.<br>
+such positions.  People never properly quote URI's, as required by
+<a href="#label.3">RFC2396</a>.<br>
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.html 48
+
+<hr size="3">
+
+<p>This is an interesting way to produce a bibliography:
+
+<p><a name="label.3">RFC2396</a>: Uniform Resource Identifies (URI): Generic Syntax
+(<a href="ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt">ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt</a>)
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.latex 30
-URI's\footnote{RFC2396} is that you have hard time knowing where they stop.  Take
-for example \url{http://www.plt-scheme.org/}: why is the slash included but
+URIs (\pageref{label.3}) is that you\footnote{the reader} have hard time knowing where they stop.
+Take for example \url{http://www.plt-scheme.org/}: why is the slash included but
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.latex 33
-such positions.  People never properly quote URI's.}?  (Another example is
+such positions.  People never properly quote URI's, as required by
+RFC2396 (\pageref{label.3}).}?  (Another example is
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.latex 45
+
+
+\begin{center}\rule{0.5\textwidth}{0.04em}\end{center}
+
+
+This is an interesting way to produce a bibliography:
+
+\label{label.3}RFC2396: Uniform Resource Identifies (URI): Generic Syntax
+(\url{ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt})
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.man 49
-URI's\&
+URIs is that you\&
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.man 51
-\& is that you have hard time knowing where they stop.  Take
-for example \fChttp://www.plt-scheme.org/\fP: why is the slash included but
+\& have hard time knowing where they stop.
+Take for example \fChttp://www.plt-scheme.org/\fP: why is the slash included but
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.man 60
-\& RFC2396
+\& the reader
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.man 65
-such positions.  People never properly quote URI's.
+such positions.  People never properly quote URI's, as required by
+RFC2396.
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.man 111
+.PP
+\(em \(em \(em
+.PP
+This is an interesting way to produce a bibliography:
+.PP
+RFC2396: Uniform Resource Identifies (URI): Generic Syntax
+(\fCftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt\fP)
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.test 29
-URI's[RFC2396] is that you have hard time knowing where they stop.  Take
-for example http://www.plt-scheme.org/: why is the slash included but
+URIs[RFC2396] is that you[the reader] have hard time knowing where they stop.
+Take for example http://www.plt-scheme.org/: why is the slash included but
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.test 35
-such positions.  People never properly quote URI's.
+such positions.  People never properly quote URI's, as required by
+[RFC2396].
hunk ./regression/link-abbrev.test 46
+
+----
+
+This is an interesting way to produce a bibliography:
+
+[+RFC2396+]: Uniform Resource Identifies (URI): Generic Syntax
+(ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2396.txt)
}